Position:home>Car knowledge>The company that rent a car should be denied load duty traffic accident problem
The company that rent a car should be denied load duty traffic accident problem
From;  Author:Stand originally
The court thinks the company that rent a car earned a profit, carry corresponding compensatory risk with respect to the agree, but can wait for method avoid through increasing risk
Topic genesis
The citizen drives hired the car that come to give an accident, should the company that rent assume liability to pay compensation? The city that our newspaper carries solely to the society High Court " the directive opinion that case of traffic accident compensation hears " the regulation is made clear in asking for an opinion to stalk of grain, the company that rent a car will assume implicative liability to pay compensation.
Recently, the earnest, opinion book that did not sign passes an one's words to city tall courtyard solicit opinion mail case. The car rents trade public figure to think, this regulation made the company that rent a car complete become the weak, steam hires an industry to be able to be forced break down by compensation. Caused steam to hire trade public figure and judge from this between about " whether should be the company that rent a car carried duty " discuss greatly, what kind of result does final meeting have?
Does the 1 company that rent a car meet the topic be broken down by compensate?
Recently, a few steam hire trade public figure to think, car is handed in bear in hiring square hand that rises momently, the company that rent has control capacity to its no longer, became complete weak, be partitioned by others at will. The company that rent hires the car the person that has a driver's license. Tenant causes traffic accident because of his error, do not have with the company that rent direct causal, the company that rent assumes responsibility, consequence is unimaginable... because manage not to be pooh-poohed to close down,the car company that rent is not, can be forced break down by unreasonable compensation however!
The risk is OK avoid
"Enjoy an interest to be about to assume a risk, this regulation design can make the industry that rent more normative only. " the explanation of judge of inkstone of drafter a surname that seeks opinion draft says: The company that rent a bit not compensate, enjoy the benefit that rent a car only, do not assume a risk, apparently unreasonable.
If be in only,insurance compensation specified amount is spent inside compensation, the certain company that rent may decrease for managing cost keep the specified number. Besides, insurance premium serves as cost, already calculated tenant head to go up, in order to protect frontal in the limit of, did not let rent a company to assume liability to pay compensation essentially. To protect victim interest, letting the company that rent assume implicative liability to pay compensation is reasonable.
Wu Yan still thinks, the company that rent is passed raise earnest money, increase the means such as risk, can the risk that effective avoid compensates for.
Case: On August 3, 2004 20 when 58 minutes, the driver of some hire of the accused Liu is glad forest drive truck of a of the A car company that rent heavy-duty dump, by river north area 5 lis of inn are gone to travel of Tongjia courtyard direction, with the autocycle barge against that accuser Li Mou drives, cause glad forest death, li Mou gets hurt the traffic accident that reachs two cars damage. The policeman maintains glad Lin Fuquan duty.
Previous12 Next